Release Process¶
This document explains the official release workflow for Aniwa, including:
- versioning
- testing
- packaging
- PyPI publishing
- GitHub releases
- release validation
- long-term release strategy
The goal is to ensure releases remain:
Purpose of the Release Process¶
A strong release process ensures:
- stable public versions
- reproducible builds
- trusted package distribution
- predictable versioning
- healthy project evolution
Release Philosophy¶
Aniwa releases should prioritize:
| Principle | Purpose |
|---|---|
| stability | reliable installations |
| reproducibility | consistent builds |
| clarity | understandable releases |
| maintainability | long-term scalability |
| professionalism | trusted ecosystem |
Versioning Philosophy¶
Aniwa follows:
Semantic Versioning Structure¶
Format:
Example¶
Example:
Meaning of Each Version Type¶
| Type | Meaning |
|---|---|
| MAJOR | breaking changes |
| MINOR | new features |
| PATCH | bug fixes |
Example Release Progression¶
Example:
Current Release Phase¶
Aniwa is currently in:
Why Early Versions Matter¶
Early releases establish:
- architecture foundations
- contributor workflows
- ecosystem trust
Release Workflow Overview¶
High-level release flow:
Step 1 — Finalize Features¶
Before releasing:
- merge stable PRs
- finish testing
- complete documentation
Step 2 — Run All Tests¶
Always run:
Why Testing Matters¶
Testing prevents:
- regressions
- broken releases
- installation failures
Step 3 — Run Linting¶
Run:
Step 4 — Format the Codebase¶
Run:
Step 5 — Verify CLI Functionality¶
Test core commands manually.
Example:
Step 6 — Verify Report Systems¶
Test:
- JSON reports
- HTML reports
- Markdown reports
- Excel reports
- PDF reports
Step 7 — Verify Config System¶
Test:
- YAML configs
- TOML configs
- JSON configs
Step 8 — Update Version Number¶
Update the version in:
Example¶
Example:
Step 9 — Update README¶
Update:
- features
- examples
- roadmap
- release information
Step 10 — Update Documentation¶
Verify docs remain current.
Update:
- docs/
- examples/
- architecture guides
Step 11 — Review Changelog¶
Document:
- features
- fixes
- improvements
- breaking changes
Recommended Changelog Sections¶
Suggested structure:
| Section |
|---|
| Added |
| Improved |
| Fixed |
| Deprecated |
Future Changelog File¶
Recommended future file:
Step 12 — Build the Package¶
Build distributions.
Example:
Why Builds Matter¶
Builds generate:
| Artifact |
|---|
| wheel |
| source distribution |
Build Output Location¶
Artifacts appear in:
Example Build Artifacts¶
Example:
Step 13 — Validate the Build¶
Check package integrity.
Example:
Why Validation Matters¶
Validation detects:
- broken metadata
- malformed packages
- publishing issues
Step 14 — Upload to PyPI¶
Publish the package.
Example:
Recommended Secure Upload Method¶
Recommended:
Why API Tokens Matter¶
API tokens improve:
- security
- account protection
- automation
Using .pypirc¶
You may configure:
to avoid re-entering tokens repeatedly.
Example .pypirc¶
Example:
Step 15 — Verify PyPI Installation¶
After publishing:
Verify the CLI¶
Test:
Step 16 — Create Git Tag¶
Create a release tag.
Example:
Push Tags¶
Example:
Why Tags Matter¶
Tags provide:
- historical tracking
- release references
- reproducibility
Step 17 — Create GitHub Release¶
Create a GitHub Release using:
- version tag
- release notes
- changelog summary
Why GitHub Releases Matter¶
GitHub releases improve:
- discoverability
- community visibility
- release history
Recommended Release Title¶
Example:
Recommended Release Structure¶
Suggested release notes:
| Section |
|---|
| Highlights |
| Added |
| Improved |
| Fixed |
| Next Steps |
Release Validation Checklist¶
Before publishing, verify:
| Check |
|---|
| tests pass |
| linting passes |
| formatting passes |
| docs updated |
| examples valid |
| package builds |
| CLI works |
Example Manual Validation Commands¶
Run Tests¶
Run Formatter¶
Run Linter¶
Build Package¶
Validate Build¶
Install Locally¶
Test CLI¶
Release Branch Philosophy¶
Future releases may use:
Why Release Branches Matter¶
Release branches improve:
- stabilization
- coordinated releases
- enterprise workflows
Future CI/CD Release Automation¶
Future systems may automate:
- testing
- builds
- publishing
- GitHub releases
Potential Future Tooling¶
Potential systems:
| Tool |
|---|
| GitHub Actions |
| Dependabot |
| release pipelines |
Example Future Workflow¶
Potential future flow:
Pre-Release Philosophy¶
Future versions may support:
| Type |
|---|
| alpha |
| beta |
| rc |
Example Pre-Release Versions¶
Examples:
Why Pre-Releases Matter¶
Pre-releases improve:
- testing
- feedback collection
- stabilization
Backward Compatibility Philosophy¶
Minor and patch releases should avoid:
Breaking Change Philosophy¶
Breaking changes should:
- be documented clearly
- be minimized
- justify architectural value
Release Documentation Philosophy¶
Every release should include:
- release notes
- migration guidance
- feature summaries
Security Release Philosophy¶
Security fixes should prioritize:
- rapid patching
- transparent communication
- safe upgrades
Long-Term Release Strategy¶
Aniwa aims to evolve toward:
Future Enterprise Release Features¶
Potential future systems:
| Feature |
|---|
| signed packages |
| reproducible builds |
| release verification |
| enterprise support channels |
Release Frequency Philosophy¶
Releases should prioritize:
Why Stable Releases Matter¶
Stable releases improve:
- trust
- adoption
- ecosystem confidence
Contributor Release Expectations¶
Contributors should:
- test thoroughly
- document changes
- avoid rushed merges
Release Anti-Patterns¶
Avoid:
| Anti-Pattern |
|---|
| untested releases |
| undocumented breaking changes |
| rushed publishing |
| skipping validation |
Long-Term Vision¶
Aniwa’s release process is evolving toward:
Final Philosophy¶
The release process exists to ensure that:
Related Documentation¶
Continue with:
- developer-guide/testing.md
- developer-guide/local-development.md
- architecture/system-design.md
- CONTRIBUTING.md